In the corporate sphere , there are acts of wrongdoing that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that put a spotlight on moral failures. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , exemplifies this type of scenario — a tale of presumed malfeasance that deeply harms the reputation of a single manager but calls into question over the company’s principles .

In spite of numerous complaints, Collins has held onto his title , visibly unaffected by the uproar enveloping him . How has this been enabled to go on ? What does this say about the firm’s focus on transparency ? As per the accounts of those familiar, Collins’ history of questionable behavior began with breaches of the business principles, but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it evolved into a cascade of dubious behaviors that has left coworkers disillusioned and customers perplexed.

During a leadership training program — intended to foster better management—David Collins allegedly converted what should have been a professional opportunity into a series of reckless events . Insiders suggest he spent organization-paid excursions pursuing romantic liaisons , a flagrant contravention of Ventia’s shared values , all while his family remained uninformed .

But the impropriety didn’t conclude with these Ventia encounters . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged improper use of company IT systems to send explicit photos to women—a clear misuse of professional tools and a breach of trust . His reckless employment of Microsoft Teams to send suggestive messages —including symbols celebrating indiscretions— exposes a personality of a man indifferent to the outcomes . Following these digital advances , Collins allegedly escalated his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in physical relationships with an employee on numerous occurrences during work time , despite his being married and her having a committed relationship . This blatant misuse of company time and resources shattered workplace protocols but tore apart homes— causing a string of heartbreak that extended far beyond the organizational context.

Why can this behavior be allowed to endure ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly broken every professional standard is still employed at Ventia? The response , it appears, lies in a problematic dearth of accountability within the firm . Concerns have been voiced, yet Collins continues unchecked .

This lack of consequence broadcasts an ominous signal : that rank and influence within the firm can protect individuals from Ventia New Zealand consequences . It breeds a damaging work setting, discourages team members, and ultimately damages the firm’s reputation .